Sturgeon’s Law

Ninety per­cent of every­thing is crap.


Derived from a quote by sci­ence fic­tion author Theodore Stur­geon, who once said, “Sure, 90% of sci­ence fic­tion is crud. That’s because 90% of every­thing is crud.” Oddly, when Sturgeon’s Law is cited, the final word is almost invari­ably changed to ‘crap’.

Random Images

Streak Port Royal - 29935 Langley - 29834 Amusement

Miles Per Gallon

Fuelly Fuelly

Email Dance

I received a reply from the SCDNR guy this morning:

The reg­u­la­tion is more up-to-date than you can find. Typ­i­cally, there is a delay from the time of approval to the point the inter­net reg­u­la­tions are updated.

I do appre­ci­ate your inter­est in the her­itage pre­serve pro­gram, and I encour­age you to con­sider use of SCDNR prop­er­ties through other allowed activ­i­ties such as hik­ing or bird­ing. Below is a link to all of the HPs found in SC.

Then a minute later:

I forgot…can you send me the lat/longs for Hen­der­son & Savan­nah HPs.

He seems kind of anx­ious to get the lat & long of those caches…In his orig­i­nal email he men­tions Reg­u­la­tion 123–203 (T) and at first I though maybe the T was a revi­sion level, but after read­ing the regs posted on the SC Gov Site I’m think­ing the T rep­re­sents a new sec­tion of the code as the cur­rent one ends at S. I’m hav­ing a hard time believ­ing that geo­caching would war­rant its own sec­tion, but hey what do I know. So I asked him for a copy:

Wow, more up to date than Sep­tem­ber 26, 2008. Is there any­way I can get a copy of the updated regs? There is a gath­er­ing of local geo­cachers this com­ing week­end and I would like to let them know about this change.

That was at quar­ter to 10 this morn­ing. So far no response.

I think I’m going to con­tact the local cache reviewer and clue him in to my con­ver­sa­tion, maybe he can even get a copy of the updated regulations.

Started down, went up, still up.
Miata Top Tran­si­tions since 10/24/08: 359

2 comments to Email Dance

  • Brett Moule

    Brian, I appre­ci­ate you updat­ing the rest of the cachers. I am more than happy to help you in any way pos­si­ble. Remem­ber, the point of these prop­er­ties are to pro­tect the nat­ural resources…as I men­tioned in my first email. It becomes dif­fi­cult to pro­tect both flora, fauna, and nat­ural ecosys­tems when the gen­eral pub­lic does not adhere (get of trails, lit­ter, etc) to the approved laws. I am not anx­ious about the lat/longs…I do not want to waste my time look­ing for them. More­over, as I responded ear­lier we have begun burn & deer sea­sons (pri­vate), so I do not want any­one to get injured. The sooner the caches are removed the bet­ter. If you have any ques­tions, please feel free to call me.

    Region 3 Her­itage Pre­serve Manager

  • I see you have stum­bled on my lit­tle cor­ner of the Inter­net, welcome.

    Some quick research on geocaching.com reveals that the SRB cache has been in place since 10/6/2003 and has logged over 120 vis­its. I emailed the owner before I con­tacted you hop­ing to get the name of who he talked to at SCDNR, but he was unable to give me a name, but men­tion he had worked with some one and had actu­ally relo­cated his cache at the request of SCDNR from nearer the rocks to back closer to the trail loop.

    The owner of the two Hen­der­son caches never responded to my email. The Sand­hills cache has been in place since 3/10/2007 and has a lit­tle over 50 vis­its. The Uthorent cache is the newest as it is in the newer sec­tion and has been there only since 3/22/2009 with just 13 vis­its. I can’t see where that much traf­fic would be a real big men­ace to the nat­ural resources of these areas, but then again I’m not the expert here.

    Check your email in the morn­ing for the coords for the three caches. If I didn’t already have plans to head to NC for some hik­ing and geo­caching this week­end I would vol­un­teer to lead you right to them, as some­times even with the lat/long they can still be hard to locate.